Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs Celeron 1005M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-3110M Core i3-3120M Core i3-3217U Core i5-3210M Core i5-3230M Core i5-3320M Core i5-3337U Core i7-3520M Core i7-3610QM Core i7-3630QM Core i7-3632QM Pentium 2020M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 FX-62 Athlon 64 LE-1620 Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
+22.8%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.57

Celeron 1005M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron 1005M Celeron 1005M
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27022809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.890.61
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB512K
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size94 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70
+22.8%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1108
+21.6%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 911

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1005M 326
+41.1%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 231

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1005M 563
+40.4%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 401

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.70 0.57
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

Celeron 1005M has a 22.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 1005M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1005M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron 1005M Celeron 1005M
vs
Phenom II X3 N830 Phenom II X3 N830
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+
vs
Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Celeron 1005M Celeron 1005M
vs
Celeron N3350 Celeron N3350
Celeron 1005M Celeron 1005M
vs
Phenom II X4 945 (125W) Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
A4-1200 A4 1200
vs
i5-11400H Core i5 11400H
Xeon W3690 Xeon W3690
vs
i3-10110U Core i3 10110U
Phenom II X3 710 Phenom II X3 710
vs
Sempron LE-1100 Sempron LE 1100
Phenom II X2 B57 Phenom II X2 B57
vs
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Xeon E5-2670 v2 Xeon E5 2670 v2
vs
Xeon W3690 Xeon W3690
Xeon E5-2670 v2 Xeon E5 2670 v2
vs
Xeon W3580 Xeon W3580
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Celeron Dual Core T3500
vs
i7-12650H Core i7 12650H
i7-6800K Core i7 6800K
vs
Xeon E5-2630 Xeon E5 2630
Pentium G3420 Pentium G3420
vs
Pentium E5500 Pentium E5500

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 115 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.