A6-5345M vs Celeron 1005M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.71
A6-5345M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.72
+1.4%

A6-5345M outperforms Celeron 1005M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27022698
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.883.93
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FP2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 8410G
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.71
A6-5345M 0.72
+1.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1108
A6-5345M 1122
+1.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.72
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 1005M has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

A6-5345M, on the other hand, has a 1.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and A6-5345M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
AMD A6-5345M
A6-5345M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-5345M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or A6-5345M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.