Xeon Gold 6246 vs C-70

VS

Primary details

Comparing C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.02
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD C-SeriesIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiencyno data8.96
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,286

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)12 MB
L3 cache0 KB24.75 MB
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6290no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

C-70 315
Xeon Gold 6246 24829
+7782%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2012 2 April 2019
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 165 Watt

C-70 has 1733.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6246, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that C-70 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6246 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-70 and Xeon Gold 6246, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-70
C-70
Intel Xeon Gold 6246
Xeon Gold 6246

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 94 votes

Rate C-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6246 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-70 or Xeon Gold 6246, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.