Athlon MP 2100+ vs C-60
Primary details
Comparing C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3219 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD C-Series | AMD Athlon MP |
| Power efficiency | 2.10 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 19 June 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $262 |
Detailed specifications
C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 128 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 38 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 66 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 August 2011 | 19 June 2002 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 66 Watt |
C-60 has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that C-60 is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 2100+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-60 and Athlon MP 2100+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
