Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs C-50

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD C-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads228
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistorsno data9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallSP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4 Quad-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6250no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 29 July 2017
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 28
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 180 Watt

C-50 has 1900% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that C-50 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-50
C-50
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 268 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-50 or Ryzen Threadripper 1940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.