Ultra 7 265K vs C-50

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated80
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data96.97
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD C-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data28.72
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm3 nm
Die size75 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-Ball1851
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6250Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

C-50 265
Ultra 7 265K 60140
+22594%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 40 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 125 Watt

C-50 has 1288.9% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that C-50 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-50 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-50
C-50
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 268 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-50 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.