Athlon 950 vs C-50
Primary details
Comparing C-50 and Athlon 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3269 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.79 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Detailed specifications
C-50 and Athlon 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 0.95 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 102 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 22 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on C-50 and Athlon 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 62 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-50 and Athlon 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-50 and Athlon 950 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-50 and Athlon 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 6 March 2000 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 62 Watt |
C-50 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 588.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between C-50 and Athlon 950. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that C-50 is a notebook processor while Athlon 950 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-50 and Athlon 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
