FX-8350 vs Atom x7835RE
Aggregate performance score
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1540 | 1538 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 87 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.89 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD FX-Series (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 29.29 | 2.82 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $127 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.69 | 3.70 |
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 23 October 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 125 Watt |
Atom x7835RE has an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 941.7% lower power consumption.
FX-8350, on the other hand, has a 0.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Atom x7835RE and AMD FX-8350.
Be aware that Atom x7835RE is a notebook processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
