K6-2E+/400ATZ vs Atom x7809C
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD K6-2+ |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024) | K6-III (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 0.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 100 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 4.0 |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 0.18 µm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | Super Socket 7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 9.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 9 Watt |
Atom x7809C has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
K6-2E+/400ATZ, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7809C and K6-2E+/400ATZ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
