Turion 64 ML-44 vs Atom x7-E3950

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.17
+350%
Turion 64 ML-44
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.26

Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Turion 64 ML-44 by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23723149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomTurion 64
Power efficiency9.230.70
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date26 October 2016 (8 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data125 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296754
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 505 (500 - 650 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.17
+350%
Turion 64 ML-44 0.26

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom x7-E3950 2152
+129%
Turion 64 ML-44 940

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom x7-E3950 30.26
+131%
Turion 64 ML-44 70

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.26
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

Atom x7-E3950 has a 350% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7-E3950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-44 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Turion 64 ML-44, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
AMD Turion 64 ML-44
Turion 64 ML-44

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-44 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or Turion 64 ML-44, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.