Atom E3845 vs x7-E3950

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.17
+74.6%
Atom E3845
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.67

Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Atom E3845 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23722747
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomAtom
Power efficiency9.226.34
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.91 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 505 (500 - 650 MHz)Intel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.17
+74.6%
Atom E3845 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7-E3950 1864
+75%
Atom E3845 1065

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.67
Integrated graphics card 0.93 0.77
Recency 30 August 2014 8 October 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 10 Watt

Atom x7-E3950 has a 74.6% higher aggregate performance score, 20.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom E3845, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7-E3950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3845 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Atom E3845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 18 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or Atom E3845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.