Atom C3338 vs x7-E3950

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.22
+82.1%

Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Atom C3338 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23512744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency9.276.79
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date26 October 2016 (8 years ago)22 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache56K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA 1296FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 505no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes410
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data10
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data10
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.22
+82.1%
Atom C3338 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7-E3950 1864
+81.3%
Atom C3338 1028

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.67
Recency 26 October 2016 22 February 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 8 Watt

Atom x7-E3950 has a 82.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom C3338, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7-E3950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3338 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook processor while Atom C3338 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
Intel Atom C3338
Atom C3338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or Atom C3338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.