Celeron N4000 vs Atom x5-Z8550

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8550
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.72
Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93
+29.2%

Celeron N4000 outperforms Atom x5-Z8550 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26852510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data14.67
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.44 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplierno data11
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 deg C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency600 MHz650 MHz
Execution Units1212

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160no data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes26
USB revision3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB ports38
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8550 0.72
Celeron N4000 0.93
+29.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8550 1144
Celeron N4000 1472
+28.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x5-Z8550 170
Celeron N4000 325
+91.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x5-Z8550 487
Celeron N4000 528
+8.4%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Atom x5-Z8550 134
Celeron N4000 138
+3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Atom x5-Z8550 36
Celeron N4000 71
+96.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.93
Recency 8 February 2016 11 December 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

Atom x5-Z8550 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N4000, on the other hand, has a 29.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Celeron N4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8550 and Celeron N4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8550
Atom x5-Z8550
Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 897 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8550 or Celeron N4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.