A6-5357M vs Atom x5-Z8500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8500
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.78
+6.8%
A6-5357M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.73

Atom x5-Z8500 outperforms A6-5357M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26402684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomAMD A-Series
Power efficiencyno data1.97
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.44 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380FP2
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160no data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes2no data
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8500 0.78
+6.8%
A6-5357M 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8500 1236
+6.1%
A6-5357M 1165

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 0.73
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.88
Recency 2 March 2015 1 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

Atom x5-Z8500 has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A6-5357M, on the other hand, has 14.3% faster integrated GPU.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8500 and A6-5357M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Atom x5-Z8500
AMD A6-5357M
A6-5357M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 16 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate A6-5357M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8500 or A6-5357M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.