i7-12650H vs Atom x5-Z8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8350
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.56
Core i7-12650H
2022
10 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
14.16
+2429%

Core i7-12650H outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by a whopping 2429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2838515
Place by popularitynot in top-10081
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Alder Lake-P
Power efficiencyno data29.76
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Alder Lake-H (2022)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.44 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data217 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA592Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types4 GBDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1400 MHz)
Max video memory2 GBno data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes120
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8350 0.56
i7-12650H 14.16
+2429%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8350 892
i7-12650H 22493
+2422%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom x5-Z8350 903
i7-12650H 8301
+820%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom x5-Z8350 2979
i7-12650H 34902
+1072%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom x5-Z8350 36.2
i7-12650H 6.94
+422%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Atom x5-Z8350 1
i7-12650H 18
+1442%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Atom x5-Z8350 97
i7-12650H 1852
+1809%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Atom x5-Z8350 28
i7-12650H 250
+793%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Atom x5-Z8350 0.36
i7-12650H 2.97
+725%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 14.16
Integrated graphics card 0.77 7.21
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

i7-12650H has a 2428.6% higher aggregate performance score, 836.4% faster integrated GPU, 150% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-12650H is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8350 and Core i7-12650H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Core i7-12650H
Core i7-12650H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 379 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1621 vote

Rate Core i7-12650H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8350 or Core i7-12650H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.