Celeron N2808 vs Atom x5-Z8350

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8350
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.56
+75%
Celeron N2808
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.32

Atom x5-Z8350 outperforms Celeron N2808 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28373097
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data7.53
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.44 GHz1.58 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz2.25 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA592FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types4 GBDDR3
Maximum memory size2 GB4 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s10.66 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency500 MHz792 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes14
USB revision3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8350 0.56
+75%
Celeron N2808 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8350 892
+74.9%
Celeron N2808 510

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.32
Recency 8 February 2016 22 May 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm

Atom x5-Z8350 has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Atom x5-Z8350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2808 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N2808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 378 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8350 or Celeron N2808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.