Athlon XP 2400+ vs Atom x5-Z8350

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8350
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.56
+273%
Athlon XP 2400+
2002
1 core / 1 thread, 68 Watt
0.15

Atom x5-Z8350 outperforms Athlon XP 2400+ by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28383324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data0.21
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Thorton (2001−2003)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)August 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$90

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.44 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data80 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA592A
Power consumption (TDP)no data68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types4 GBno data
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes1no data
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8350 0.56
+273%
Athlon XP 2400+ 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8350 892
+281%
Athlon XP 2400+ 234

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.15
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

Atom x5-Z8350 has a 273.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Atom x5-Z8350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 2400+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-Z8350 is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2400+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8350 and Athlon XP 2400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350
AMD Athlon XP 2400+
Athlon XP 2400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 379 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 52 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8350 or Athlon XP 2400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.