Celeron J1750 vs Atom x5-E8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2784not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiency11.49no data
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39$72

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed1.04 GHz2.41 GHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E8000 962
+61.7%
Celeron J1750 595

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 February 2016 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 10 Watt

Atom x5-E8000 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000
Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E8000 or Celeron J1750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.