A4-3400 vs Atom x5-E8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E8000
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
0.63

A4-3400 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27832712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiency11.491.00
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.04 GHz2.7 GHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFM1
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsRadeon HD 6410D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E8000 0.63
A4-3400 0.71
+12.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E8000 962
A4-3400 1086
+12.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x5-E8000 150
A4-3400 289
+92.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x5-E8000 413
A4-3400 485
+17.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 0.71
Recency 8 February 2016 7 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 65 Watt

Atom x5-E8000 has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1200% lower power consumption.

A4-3400, on the other hand, has a 12.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The A4-3400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E8000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-E8000 is a notebook processor while A4-3400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E8000 and A4-3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000
AMD A4-3400
A4-3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 83 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E8000 or A4-3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.