Ryzen Embedded R1102G vs Atom x5-E3930
Primary details
Comparing Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2801 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 5x Intel Atom | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 7.84 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 30 August 2014 (10 years ago) | 25 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 12 |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.8 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 19.199 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 500 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 2.98 |
| Recency | 30 August 2014 | 25 February 2020 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1102G has 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and 16.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3930 and Ryzen Embedded R1102G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
