Ultra 9 285 vs Atom x3-C3200RK

Primary details

Comparing Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series3x Intel Atomno data
Architecture codenameSilvermont (2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date4 March 2015 (9 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
GPIO4 x I2Cno data

Security technologies

Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
Secure Boot+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth4.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported1no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDPup to 1920x1080no data
Max refresh rate60 Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

OpenGLES 2.0no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20
USB revision2.0 OTGno data
Number of USB ports1no data
UART2 x USIF configurableno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

Ultra 9 285 has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom x3-C3200RK is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x3-C3200RK and Core Ultra 9 285, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x3-C3200RK
Atom x3-C3200RK
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Core Ultra 9 285

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 3 votes

Rate Atom x3-C3200RK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 70 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x3-C3200RK or Core Ultra 9 285, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.