Xeon Gold 5320H vs Atom Z670

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data12.60
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date11 April 2011 (13 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads240
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typecDMIno data
Bus rate400 MT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache56 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB27.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size65 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketT-PBGA518FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory size2.93 GB1.12 TB
Max memory channels16
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H integrated GPUs.

LVDS+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48
PCI support-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z670 158
Xeon Gold 5320H 31718
+19975%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2011 6 April 2021
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 2 40
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 150 Watt

Atom Z670 has 4900% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5320H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z670 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Xeon Gold 5320H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H
Xeon Gold 5320H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5320H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z670 or Xeon Gold 5320H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.