Ryzen 9 5900X vs Atom Z670
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 198 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 32.42 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD Ryzen 9 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 22.20 |
| Architecture codename | Lincroft (2010−2011) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| Release date | 11 April 2011 (13 years ago) | 8 October 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus type | cDMI | no data |
| Bus rate | 400 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 8 | 37 |
| L1 cache | 56 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | 2x 74 mm2(CCD) + 125 mm2 (IOD) |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | 0 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | T-PBGA518 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 2.93 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB/s | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX535 | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X integrated GPUs.
| LVDS | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI support | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 April 2011 | 8 October 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 105 Watt |
Atom Z670 has 3400% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 5900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom Z670 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
