Celeron N4020 vs Atom Z670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2476
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Gemini Lake
Power efficiencyno data15.39
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date11 April 2011 (13 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typecDMIno data
Bus rate400 MT/s15 MHz
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size65 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketT-PBGA518FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory size2.93 GB8 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
LVDS+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
PCI support-no data
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z670 158
Celeron N4020 1548
+880%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z670 497
Celeron N4020 2184
+339%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z670 759
Celeron N4020 4427
+483%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom Z670 151
Celeron N4020 29.66
+409%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Atom Z670 0
Celeron N4020 2
+677%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2011 4 November 2019
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 6 Watt

Atom Z670 has 100% lower power consumption.

Celeron N4020, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670
Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1770 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z670 or Celeron N4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.