Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Atom Z610
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 463 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 93 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 40.75 |
| Architecture codename | Lincroft (2010−2011) | Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) |
| Release date | 4 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 April 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 4.75 GHz |
| Bus type | cDMI | no data |
| Bus rate | 400 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 8 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 65.2526 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 518 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1.3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX535 | AMD Radeon 680M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 May 2010 | 1 April 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom Z610 has 3400% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7735HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z610 and Ryzen 7 7735HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
