Celeron 1020M vs Atom Z520

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2599
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data2.16
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$86

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.33 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size24.18 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors47 Million1,400 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.75-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA441FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVO-+
CRT-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z520 122
Celeron 1020M 1275
+945%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 20 January 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 35 Watt

Atom Z520 has 1650% lower power consumption.

Celeron 1020M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and Celeron 1020M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
Intel Celeron 1020M
Celeron 1020M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 27 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Celeron 1020M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z520 or Celeron 1020M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.