Turion 64 MK-38 vs Atom Z3770
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | Turion 64 |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) | Richmond |
Release date | 27 September 2013 (11 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $37 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.46 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.39 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | UTFCBGA1380 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38 are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 31 Watt |
Atom Z3770 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 287.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3770 and Turion 64 MK-38, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.