Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Atom Z3735G

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$17$134

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size112 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketUTFCBGA592BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size1 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth5.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency646 MHzno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3735G 772
+60.2%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z3735G 946
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250
+32.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z3735G 2891
+21.5%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom Z3735G 1526
+52.6%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 April 2014 1 September 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 10 Watt

Atom Z3735G has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3735G and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 66 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3735G or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.