Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Atom Z2760
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 551 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 84.56 |
| Architecture codename | Cloverview (2012) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 27 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FC-MB4760 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2.4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) | AMD Radeon 760M |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 September 2012 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom Z2760 has 400% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2760 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
