Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs Atom Z2580
Aggregate performance score
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3148 | 3151 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 7.89 | 0.68 |
| Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) | August 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FC-MB4760 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Smart Idle | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 533 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+.
| USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 2 | no data |
| UART | 3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom Z2580 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2580 and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
