Celeron N2810 vs Atom Z2580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameClovertrail (2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date27 February 2013 (11 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$260

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size65 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-MB4760FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE32 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
Smart Idle+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory size2 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth8.5 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequency533 MHz756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revision2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB ports25
UART3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Atom Z2580 1303
Celeron N2810 1328
+2%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Atom Z2580 552
Celeron N2810 762
+38%

Geekbench 2

Atom Z2580 1479
Celeron N2810 1898
+28.3%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2013 11 September 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 7 Watt

Atom Z2580 has 100% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron N2810, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2580
Atom Z2580
Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Atom Z2580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2580 or Celeron N2810, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.