Celeron N2810 vs Atom Z2580
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) | 11 September 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $260 |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 617 | Intel BGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Geekbench 2
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 February 2013 | 11 September 2013 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 7 Watt |
Atom Z2580 has 100% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
Celeron N2810, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2580 and Celeron N2810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
