C-70 vs Atom Z2560
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2560 and C-70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD C-Series |
Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
Release date | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 September 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2560 and C-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | 65 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2560 and C-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FC-MB4760 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2560 and C-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Smart Idle | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2560 and C-70 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2560 and C-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | AMD Radeon HD 6290 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2560 and C-70 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2560 and C-70.
USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 2 | no data |
UART | 3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Geekbench 2
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 27 February 2013 | 1 September 2012 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 9 Watt |
Atom Z2560 has an age advantage of 5 months, 100% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z2560 and C-70. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2560 and C-70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.