Ryzen 7 5800U vs Atom Z2480
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 617 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Architecture codename | Penwell (2012−2013) | Cezanne-U (Zen 3) |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 617 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2013 | 12 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom Z2480 has 400% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 5800U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2480 and Ryzen 7 5800U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
