Celeron N4020C vs Atom Z2480
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2405 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Penwell (2012−2013) | no data |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 617 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2013 | 1 January 2021 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom Z2480 has 100% lower power consumption.
Celeron N4020C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2480 and Celeron N4020C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
