Atom N2850 vs N570

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N570 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date1 March 2011 (13 years ago)5 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N570 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate666 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N570 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559no data
Power consumption (TDP)8.5 Watt6,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N570 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N570 and Atom N2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N570 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N570 and Atom N2850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2011 5 January 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 6 Watt

Atom N2850 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom N570 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N570 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N570
Atom N570
Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 131 vote

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N570 or Atom N2850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.