Celeron G6900TE vs Atom N550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data4.03
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date23 August 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate666 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA5591700
Power consumption (TDP)8.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe versionno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N550 283
Celeron G6900TE 2373
+739%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 August 2010 4 January 2022
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

Atom N550 has 100% more threads, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N550 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N550 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N550
Atom N550
Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Atom N550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N550 or Celeron G6900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.