i5-10400F vs Atom N470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated890
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date10 March 2010 (14 years ago)20 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.83 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB12 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors123 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory size2 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N470 224
i5-10400F 13029
+5717%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N470 600
i5-10400F 6719
+1020%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N470 930
i5-10400F 36564
+3832%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N470 106.7
i5-10400F 6.25
+1607%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2010 20 May 2020
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

Atom N470 has 983.3% lower power consumption.

i5-10400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N470 is a notebook processor while Core i5-10400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N470 and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N470
Atom N470
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 37 votes

Rate Atom N470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13102 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N470 or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.