i9-13900KF vs Atom N455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated93
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data61.55
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Core i9
Power efficiencyno data13.74
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.66 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB12 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size66 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors123 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 GB192 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N455 196
i9-13900KF 58349
+29670%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N455 53
i9-13900KF 2918
+5406%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N455 80
i9-13900KF 19629
+24436%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 27 September 2022
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 125 Watt

Atom N455 has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 2300% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N455 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N455 and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N455
Atom N455
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 238 votes

Rate Atom N455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 626 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N455 or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.