Atom Z530 vs N455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N455
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.12
Atom Z530
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.12

Primary details

Comparing Atom N455 and Atom Z530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33523366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.625.16
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$95

Detailed specifications

Atom N455 and Atom Z530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate533 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm224.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors123 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75 -1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Atom N455 and Atom Z530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N455 and Atom Z530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom N455 and Atom Z530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N455 and Atom Z530 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N455 and Atom Z530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N455 0.12
Atom Z530 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N455 196
+7.1%
Atom Z530 183

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N455 564
+5%
Atom Z530 537

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N455 863
+5.6%
Atom Z530 818

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N455 490
+6.9%
Atom Z530 459

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N455 119.5
+3%
Atom Z530 123.05

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 2 April 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2 Watt

Atom N455 has an age advantage of 2 years.

Atom Z530, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom N455 and Atom Z530.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N455 and Atom Z530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N455
Atom N455
Intel Atom Z530
Atom Z530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 244 votes

Rate Atom N455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 10 votes

Rate Atom Z530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N455 or Atom Z530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.