A4-5300B vs Atom N455

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N455 and A4-5300B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data1.14
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N455 and A4-5300B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.66 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size66 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors123 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N455 and A4-5300B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FM2
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N455 and A4-5300B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N455 and A4-5300B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N455 and A4-5300B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N455 and A4-5300B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon HD 7480D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N455 196
A4-5300B 1243
+534%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N455 53
A4-5300B 383
+623%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N455 80
A4-5300B 515
+544%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 2 October 2012
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

Atom N455 has 983.3% lower power consumption.

A4-5300B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N455 and A4-5300B. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N455 is a notebook processor while A4-5300B is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N455 and A4-5300B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N455
Atom N455
AMD A4-5300B
A4-5300B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 238 votes

Rate Atom N455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 66 votes

Rate A4-5300B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N455 or A4-5300B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.