Xeon E7220 vs Atom N450
Primary details
Comparing Atom N450 and Xeon E7220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Atom | no data |
Architecture codename | Pinetrail (2009−2011) | no data |
Release date | 21 December 2009 (14 years ago) | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom N450 and Xeon E7220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 64 °C |
Number of transistors | 123 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N450 and Xeon E7220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCBGA559 | PPGA604 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N450 and Xeon E7220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Demand Based Switching | - | + |
FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom N450 and Xeon E7220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N450 and Xeon E7220 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N450 and Xeon E7220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 21 December 2009 | 1 July 2007 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 80 Watt |
Atom N450 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom N450 and Xeon E7220. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom N450 is a notebook processor while Xeon E7220 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N450 and Xeon E7220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.