Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Atom N450

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.21
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Xeon Bronze
Power efficiencyno data4.04
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date21 December 2009 (14 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache56 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB11 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C77 °C
Number of transistors123 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size2 GB768 GB
Max memory channels16
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N450 203
Xeon Bronze 3106 5753
+2734%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N450 72
Xeon Bronze 3106 579
+704%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N450 114
Xeon Bronze 3106 3151
+2664%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2009 11 July 2017
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 85 Watt

Atom N450 has 1600% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3106, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N450 is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3106 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N450 and Xeon Bronze 3106, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N450
Atom N450
Intel Xeon Bronze 3106
Xeon Bronze 3106

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 174 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N450 or Xeon Bronze 3106, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.