Xeon Gold 6326 vs Atom N2850

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data11.36
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataFCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)6,6 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 185 Watt

Atom N2850 has 2983.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2850 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6326 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2850 and Xeon Gold 6326, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850
Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Xeon Gold 6326

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2850 or Xeon Gold 6326, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.