Pentium III 800 vs Atom N2850

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2850 and Pentium III 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Coppermine T (2000)
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom N2850 and Pentium III 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads4no data
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data8 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data80 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistorsno data44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2850 and Pentium III 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data370
Power consumption (TDP)6,6 Watt38 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 38 Watt

Atom N2850 has 100% more physical cores, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2850 and Pentium III 800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2850 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2850 and Pentium III 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850
Intel Pentium III  800
Pentium III 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 63 votes

Rate Pentium III 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2850 or Pentium III 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.