Atom x7425E vs N2850
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1535 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.33 |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Gracemont (2023) |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6,6 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 | Intel UHD Graphics 24EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2012 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 12 Watt |
Atom N2850 has 100% lower power consumption.
Atom x7425E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2850 and Atom x7425E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
