Xeon Silver 4309Y vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data10.92
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size4.88 GB6 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2800 444
Xeon Silver 4309Y 19237
+4233%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 105 Watt

Atom N2800 has 1650% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4309Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4309Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Xeon Silver 4309Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Xeon Silver 4309Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 103 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 11 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4309Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or Xeon Silver 4309Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.