Celeron M 723 vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)1 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors176 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size4.88 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2800 444
+66.3%
Celeron M 723 267

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N2800 648
Celeron M 723 1180
+82.1%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N2800 965
+73.9%
Celeron M 723 555

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N2800 54.3
+138%
Celeron M 723 129

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 1 September 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 5 Watt

Atom N2800 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 723, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Celeron M 723, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
Intel Celeron M 723
Celeron M 723

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 104 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 14 votes

Rate Celeron M 723 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or Celeron M 723, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.