Athlon 3000G vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N2800
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.28
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
+907%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Atom N2800 by a whopping 907% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31331681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Athlon
Power efficiency3.797.63
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2209.78 mm2?
Number of transistors176 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4.88 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)AMD Radeon Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N2800 0.28
Athlon 3000G 2.82
+907%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2800 444
Athlon 3000G 4476
+908%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 2.82
Recency 1 December 2011 7 November 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

Atom N2800 has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 907.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N2800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 104 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2112 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.