Ryzen 3 8300G vs Atom N280

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.61
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data13.12
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date1 February 2009 (15 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.66 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate666.66 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million20,900 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437AM5
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N280 157
Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
+9018%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2009 8 January 2024
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 65 Watt

Atom N280 has 3150% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N280 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N280 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N280
Atom N280
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N280 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.