A8 Pro-7150B vs Atom N280

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N280
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.10
A8 Pro-7150B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
0.96
+860%

A8 Pro-7150B outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 860% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33832504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency3.794.78
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 February 2009 (15 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate666.66 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million2410 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437FP3
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count-6
จำนวนพาธไลน์-384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-DirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N280 0.10
A8 Pro-7150B 0.96
+860%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N280 157
A8 Pro-7150B 1528
+873%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 0.96
Recency 1 February 2009 4 June 2014
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 19 Watt

Atom N280 has 850% lower power consumption.

A8 Pro-7150B, on the other hand, has a 860% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The A8 Pro-7150B is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N280 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N280 and A8 Pro-7150B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N280
Atom N280
AMD A8 Pro-7150B
A8 Pro-7150B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate A8 Pro-7150B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N280 or A8 Pro-7150B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.